A Wrinkle in Time-Shifting
Time-shifting a television program is a fair use, that much we know. But does the legality of the activity depend upon where the program is stored? Yes, according to the TV and movie studios who are
seeking an injunction against Cablevision for its proposed "network DVR" service. They argue that Cablevision's plan to store programs in a central facility, rather than on the customer's cable box, is not a fair use, but is rather an unauthorized recording, storage and retransmission of copyrighted programming. I'm having flashbacks to MP3.com's doomed
"music locker" service.
Orphan Works Bill Up For Adoption
Formally
introduced yesterday by Rep. Lamar Smith, H.R. 5439, the "Orphan Works Act of 2006," continues to get
positive reaction -- and slight criticism --from the
legal blogging community. We like it too, for the most part, though we do share many of the concerns held by
visual artists about the impact passage of the bill might have on their livelihoods. Generally speaking, however, this legislation is long overdue.
.MOBI Goes Live
Just in time for the arrival of two shiny new Treo 650's to our office today,
registration is open for the new .mobi top level domain. As to the question of whether companies risk confusing consumers should they market their .mobi URLs, I doubt it. I expect they'll restrict their marketing efforts to those avenues already directed toward mobile users, and stick with their standard .com URLs in all other respects. And while I'm not sure of the technical aspects of coding sites for mobile devices, if there's a way to construct them such that users who access a site designed specifically for mobiles via the .mobi URL see better performance than those who simply see a mobile version of the .com site, there's your marketing angle.
Hot Topics
Aaron and I attended the “Hot Topics in Arts, Entertainment & Sports” seminar at the Boston Bar Association last Friday. It wasn’t quite as well-attended as I expected (though some were viewing online), and that’s a shame as it was very interesting indeed. Of particular note was the discussion led by Lucinda Treat of the Red Sox and John Mula of the New England Patriots. Other than showing off their championship rings (which are as impressive in person as you’d expect), they discussed merchandising deals, the art of managing the salary cap (NFL) or luxury tax (MLB), and players’ rights of publicity.
Mr. Mula’s dissection of the changes ushered in by the latest CBA extension (.pdf) with respect to payroll was a head-spinning tale of very large numbers and competing interests. One point I came away with is that the new minimum salary requirements, combined with a smaller amount of cap space to be devoted to signing draft picks, means we may see fewer 6th or 7th rounders get contract offers. He also touched on an interesting aspect of incentive-laden contracts as a method of managing cap space. Whether the incentive counts against the cap depends upon whether that incentive is likely or unlikely to be met. As may be obvious, for a first-year player none of the incentives are likely to be met, as he hasn’t played a down.
On the subject of players’ rights of publicity, Mr. Mula explained that if the marketing effort involves the use of four or more players, the NFL Players Association must sign off on it (see, for example, those recent American Express ads featuring Tom Brady and his offensive line). Ms. Treat noted that in the baseball world, the use of three or more players gets the MLB Players Association involved. Fewer than that, and it's a matter between the team and the league. And where only one player is involved and the marketing effort isn't directed at the team (e.g., Vinatieri for Pizza Hut), the player simply needs approval from the team. Then there's the case of a certain former local player who appeared in an ad for a certain chicken restaurant a year or so ago without permission from a certain team. They let that one slide, but you will note I said "former" player.
Unfortunately, discussion of the MLB's lawsuit against a private fantasy league was cut short due to time constraints. Both Ms. Treat and Mr. Mula did take pains to state (unconvincingly) that the MLB and NFL had no opinion about the relationship between fantasy leagues and gambling.
In both the Red Sox and Patriots we see ownership that is very savvy at squeezing every last dollar out of their very successful products. So it was no surprise to hear both Mr. Mula and Ms. Treat point out that while their teams used to be open to unsolicited licensing opportunities, they now have the leverage to be far more selective. While it sometimes appears that the Red Sox quest for dollars is accelerating beyond what we’ve seen in the past, upon reflection I must admit much of what is visible to the fans is fairly inoffensive, and in most cases beneficial. Those Red Sox Nation membership cards are a bit much, though.
Crane-maker buys stake in adversary
Litigation as leverage in a corporate acquisition? Either way, it sure is one way to settle.
Company Wants to Trademark the Scent of Pizza
Lithuanian company trying to register the smell of pizza, for, guess what, pizza. There are so many things, both legal and practical, that are wrong with this, I'm not sure where to start. First, employees of the company need to get the difference between copyright and trademark law straighened out.
(via The Trademark Blog, via IPKat)
Reproduction of posters in book held to be fair use
The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently issued an interesting fair use opinion. The reproduction of copyrighted posters from the Bill Graham archive in a book about the history of the Grateful Dead was held to be fair use.
Direct link to a pdf of the decision. William Patry represented the Plaintiff-Appellant, Bill Graham Archives.
Be True To Your School, Part 2
Thanks go out to Attorney Wood for his
generous donation to Pierce Law. If I could afford your client's vodka, I'd knock back a shot in your honor.
The Art Of The Logo
Interesting
interview with Todd Radom, the man who is responsible for a good number of sports logos, including those of baseball's Angels and Nationals. Nice to see that not all branding is done by committee these days.
Leo Stoller cares about trees and ethics
Leo Stoller: Trademark owner (sic) and
legal ethics expert.
Sculptor accused of copying Eisenstaedt photo
And it's not Jeff Koons. Interesting that the sculptor says he based the sculpture on a photo very similar to Eisenstaedt's.
By using the other photo, Johnson said he got a kick out of getting around people who "keep art to themselves."
Be True To Your School
Harvard Law
has decided it wants its graduates to be able to actually practice law. This will not be a problem for the two Pierce Law students involved in
this recent decision. Taking four classes, studying for finals, and preparing their client's defense all at once? No problem.
The Customer Is (Almost) Always Right
Ad Age weighs in with details on the story of the Maine Tourism Board ad agency suing the blogger critical of their efforts (initial reports indicated the Maine Tourism Board was bringing suit). Businesses should take note of the advice given at the end of the article regarding what to do when you encounter a blogger who's criticizing your work. It's mostly good advice, but I take strong exception to the suggestion that the business "blog back." I can think of nothing good that could come of that scenario.
Voluntary payment for downloads
Jane Sibbery's
voluntary payment system for downloads. Including some current stats regarding how people have been using the system.
Eyes Front
The debate about laptops in class seems to crop up every year. And right on schedule,
here it is again. Interesting that the problem, if indeed there is one, doesn't seem to be related to wireless internet access per se. Rather, if the professor quoted in the story is to be believed, the problem is that even when students are taking notes, pecking away furiously on their laptops, they aren't truly participating in the discussion or retaining the information presented. Agree? Disagree?
Prada police
Local bureau of industry and commerce
opens a permanent office in Beijing's Silk Alley.
The Ripples Keep Spreading
Yet more
allegations of plagiarism against Viswanathan. And from a few days back, a
very interesting article about how the book deal came about, and the "packaging" process that may be partly to blame for the disaster this has turned out to be for Little Brown.
Elmo Loves His Goldfish
Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood has filed a complaint with the FTC against the makers of the Baby Einstein and Brain Baby videos, alleging their claims that the videos have educational benefits amount to false and deceptive advertising. Boston Globe has
the story, and the CCFC website has
the claim and supplemental materials.
As the father of a 16-month old girl, I can honestly say we've yet to purchase her any videos, educational or otherwise. However, we are bucking the American Academy of Pediactrics' suggestion that kids under two view no television at all. I mean really, childhood isn't childhood without a little Sesame Street, right?
I Repeat
Never, ever. Ever.