Legal Fixation
Friday, March 30, 2007
Thursday, March 29, 2007
You have chosen... poorly
Those of us of a certain age fondly remember the Choose Your Own Adventure book series. The conceit of the books is that over the course of the story, you the reader make various choices -- e.g. do you eat the cupcake or open the door -- each of which directs you to a different page in the book. The choice you make causes the plot to reach a different conclusion. It was pretty hot stuff for its time. My favorite, pictured above, was Your Code Name Is Jonah, which someone simply has to use as a band name.
Now it seems the Vermont-based Chooseco (great name!), owners of the "Choose Your Own Adventure" mark, is irked to find that Jeep is promoting their new Patriot model via a microsite, including the tag line "choose your adventure," where the user guides the plot of a film by choosing among different actions. Blame those young whippersnappers in creative. No sense of history.
Friday, March 23, 2007
Cablevision's network DVR, round one
Last year, Cablevision announced its plan to roll out a service whereby recorded content would be stored on the company's servers, rather than on the hard drive included with the DVR-enabled cable box. This was met, as such announcements usually are these days, with a lawsuit by movie and television studios. Yesterday, the U.S. District Court in Manhattan ruled in favor of the studios, holding that stored programs sent back to the subscriber's television would constitute an unauthorized retransmission. Cablevision is considering an appeal.Note: this post originally referenced Comcast rather than Cablevision. Clearly, despite having my own DVR, I have still been brainwashed by endless repetition of "It's Comcastic!" ads such that I can't even imagine there's any other cable company out there.
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
"If you played at SXSW, chances are you won't be remembered"
So says Coolfer in an interesting post about SXSW, heuristics, and the paradox of choice.Thursday, March 15, 2007
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Sponge versus Sponge
Creator of Bob Spongee is squeezing the creators of SpongeBob for $1.6 billion in damages for allegedly sponging off his character. Will he clean up or wipe out?Friday, March 09, 2007
Copyright Office Plans to Charge for Multiple Titles Listed in a Collection
The Copyright Office has announced that sometime between October 1, 2007, and January 1, 2008 it will begin charging a fee for contents titles listed on an application for a collection, this will include titles of songs contained on an album. The Office will include these titles in its public registration records to make them more comprehensive and more useful to those who search the records. A fee will be charged for each title: $1 for each contents title in an electronic filing: $3 for each contents title on a paper application.Electronic Filing and Fee Reduction Planned for Some Copyright Registration Applications
PhotoAttorney reports that the Copyright Office is planning a reduced fee for the filing of electronic copyright registration applications. Electronic filing is not yet available.Thursday, March 08, 2007
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
Minors in the Middle
Hollywood Reporter Esq. provides a look at the Coogan Act, the California statute designed to protect the assets of child entertainers, in the context of a simmering dispute surrounding a management contract. The Coogan Act does not apply to agency or management contracts, hence there is some question as to a minor's right to disaffirm such a contract, particularly where that contract was not approved by a court, but was entered into by the child's parent or guardian. This is at the heart of Traylor v. Berg, which pits a child actor from the sitcom "Malcolm In The Middle" against his former manager, to whom he has been ordered to pay nearly $530k in fees. The upcoming decision by the California Court of Appeals is expected to shed light on the subject.Jean Baudrillard has died
Baudrillard has died. His writings (at least some) should be read by those with an interest in contemporary philosophical thought regarding "copies," the media, and consumer culture. More on Baudrillard here. This is by no means an endorsement of all of his views or writings, but merely recognition of the loss of a very interesting character.USPTO Reports on Threats Caused by Inadvertent Filesharing
Here is a direct link to the report in pdf. Summary from RethinkIP here.Monday, March 05, 2007
Single Color Trademark Applications
Single color trademark application of the day.The mark consists of the color beige as applied to the seat housing for a fork lift truck.
Application is based on acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f).
Saturday, March 03, 2007
These are not your father's Hells Angels
"The Hells Angels are suing a Kansas couple in federal court in California for trademark infringement. The motorcycle club claims Christian and Natasha Shultz have been selling patches on eBay emblazoned with an image similar to the club's signature 'death head mark.'"Friday, March 02, 2007
Webcasting royalty rates announced
The Radio and Internet Newsletter is reporting that the Copyright Royalty Board has announced the webcasting performance royalty rates through 2010, when they reach $0.0019 per performance. Some analysis follows, the upshot of which is that at the increased rates, the performance royalties owed by the average webcaster will likely outstrip their revenues.Wikipedia as Evidence
Another in a long list of reasons why Wikipedia "evidence" should not be allowed at the USPTO.Ethiopia v(ideo). Starbucks continued
The trademark battle between Starbucks and Ethiopia has entered a new phase. Direct YouTube linkBands and the Law part. 241
Bands and solo musicians can face daunting legal issues. From complicated copyright and trademark matters, to inter-band disputes, there are many things that can get in the way of what a musician should be doing: making music. Our firm sees these problems first hand on a daily basis.I am linking to William Patry's recent post regarding copyright ownership of sound recordings by individual members of a band not for the copyright information per se. What I find interesting is the use of the band's federal trademark application as evidence of a partnership.
From the opinion: Moreover, the trademark application, signed under oath by Heraclio Garcia, asserted that the band was a partnership and that Lopez was a general partner.
Michael Atkins also has another recent post regarding trademark infringement actions involving a band called "Hi-Five". More info on Michael's blog.