Virtually Blind on SLART
Virtually Blind covers the SLART controversy in great detail.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/813af/813af14a7b4e21137164b57c08471f2a9f6bdc6c" alt="Digg!"
Mr. Doyno's registration is for the use of CHANGE ROCKS. in connection with "jewelry." I haven't seen how the Obama campaign is making use of "change rocks," though I expect its use is not a trademark use. And if it is, I'm not sure how Mr. Doyno intends to enforce use of the mark by a third party on "t-shirts or campaign memorabilia," as neither of those are jewelry (unless campaign memorabilia is far nicer than it used to be). I do note that Mr. Doyno's letter to the Obama campaign contained the qualifier "could constitute an infringement," so perhaps this isn't as urgent a matter as it's being made out to be.Stefan Doyno picked the name "Change Rocks" about three years ago when he started a business to market his patent-pending invention of rings with interchangeable stones. He's since come out with pendants and is planning a line of T-shirts.
Now 19 and a first-year student at SUNY-Buffalo, Doyno learned by Googling his company's name that Obama's camp used the "Change Rocks" trademark for a concert and campaign fundraiser on Dec. 7 in Chicago.
"I was shocked. I flipped out kind of because I was like, 'Oh no, someone else is using it,' " he said.
He called his lawyers, and they send a letter on Dec. 18 to Obama's national campaign manager, David Plouffe, that points out that the name Change Rocks is a registered U.S. trademark (No. 3,266,236) and that if Obama's campaign sells T-shirts or other campaign memorabilia with the slogan, it could constitute an infringement.